↓ Skip to main content

Multi-scale factors affecting bird use of isolated remnant oak trees in agro-ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multi-scale factors affecting bird use of isolated remnant oak trees in agro-ecosystems
Published in
Biological Conservation, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.029
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 113 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 23%
Researcher 27 22%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 48%
Environmental Science 35 28%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#9,516,022
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,506
of 7,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,220
of 115,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#34
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.