↓ Skip to main content

The risk of flawed inference in evolutionary studies when detectability is less than one.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Naturalist, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The risk of flawed inference in evolutionary studies when detectability is less than one.
Published in
The American Naturalist, September 2008
DOI 10.1086/589520
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 6 3%
United States 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 28%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 66%
Environmental Science 33 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 19 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2015.
All research outputs
#12,516,421
of 34,745,622 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#2,150
of 4,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,834
of 136,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,745,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.