↓ Skip to main content

ISFM Guidelines on Population Management and Welfare of Unowned Domestic Cats (Felis catus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ISFM Guidelines on Population Management and Welfare of Unowned Domestic Cats (Felis catus)
Published in
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, August 2013
DOI 10.1177/1098612x13500431
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew H Sparkes, Claire Bessant, Kevin Cope, Sarah L H Ellis, Lauren Finka, Vicky Halls, Karen Hiestand, Kim Horsford, Christopher Laurence, Ian MacFarlaine, Peter F Neville, Jenny Stavisky, James Yeates

Abstract

GUIDELINES RATIONALE: Cats are among the most commonly kept domestic pets, and coexist with humans in a variety of different circumstances. Cats are sentient beings and, as such, humans have a responsibility for cat welfare where humans and cats coexist. Because cats reproduce efficiently, measures to control populations are frequently needed, but these should be based on ethical and humane approaches.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 157 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 52 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 41 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 58 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,123,671
of 32,261,701 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
#110
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,092
of 232,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,261,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.