The winner of the JOSPT Reviewer of the Year Award was Roy Bechtel, PT, PhD, who performed with consistent excellence across 3 categories: (1) willingness to serve the Journal by conducting reviews, (2) insightfulness and constructiveness of the reviews, and (3) promptness of turnaround. We are very grateful to all of the many reviewers who served the Journal during 2016 by providing excellent, timely, and constructive reviews, and thank and congratulate Dr Bechtel in particular for consistently providing high-quality peer reviews for JOSPT and the authors who submit their work to the Journal. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(3):131-132. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.0103.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#21,652,722
of 27,387,710 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#2,244
of 2,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,806
of 329,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#45
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,387,710 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
