↓ Skip to main content

Performance of conventional and X2® prosthetic knees during slope descent

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biomechanics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Performance of conventional and X2® prosthetic knees during slope descent
Published in
Clinical Biomechanics, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,008,492
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#403
of 2,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,153
of 438,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.