↓ Skip to main content

Review, Historical Context, and Clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trials Exclusion Criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Review, Historical Context, and Clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trials Exclusion Criteria
Published in
Stroke, July 2013
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.113.000878
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 32 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,126,945
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#2,177
of 15,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,284
of 236,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#19
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.