Review, Historical Context, and Clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trials Exclusion Criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, July 2013

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 2 blogs
policy: 1 policy source

twitter: 7 X users
guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 124 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 8 X posts from 7 X users, with an upper bound of 82,652 followers.

RT @daigaole: Some interesting papers about RISS. “Review, Historical Context, and Clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trials Exclusio…

Some interesting papers about RISS. “Review, Historical Context, and Clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trials Exclusion Criteria: Part 1: Rapidly Improving Stroke Symptoms (RISS)” https://t.co/NV6gYzVNox

TREAT http://t.co/AK6NE2rdYR expert recs based on no evidence that we should lyse pt w/ resolving sx #FOAMed #emcritconf

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 4 additional X posts.