↓ Skip to main content

Activating FLT3 Mutations Are Detectable in Chronic and Blast Phases of Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders Other Than Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Pathology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Activating FLT3 Mutations Are Detectable in Chronic and Blast Phases of Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders Other Than Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Pathology, October 2006
DOI 10.1309/jt5be2l1fgg8p8y6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

FLT3 gene mutations, either internal tandem duplication (ITD) or D835 point mutations, have been studied extensively in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Little is known about FLT3 mutations in chronic myeloproliferative diseases (CMPDs) or their relationship with V617F JAK2 mutations. We analyzed bone marrow samples from 142 patients with Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome- CMPD or CMPD/MDS and from 119 patients with Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay. FLT3 mutations, 11 ITD and 2 D835, were detected in 13 (9.2%) patients with CMPD or CMPD/MDS, 7 in blast phase and 6 in chronic phase. Analyses for JAK2 mutations in 11 of 13 cases were all negative. By contrast, no FLT3 mutations were detected in CML, including 108 chronic and 11 blast phase cases. FLT3 mutations occur in approximately 10% of CMPD and CMPD/MDS but are not observed in JAK2+ CMPD or in CML.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,538,272
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Pathology
#3,201
of 3,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,815
of 67,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Pathology
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.