↓ Skip to main content

Preadmission Hyperglycemia is an Independent Risk Factor for In-Hospital Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism After Major Orthopedic Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preadmission Hyperglycemia is an Independent Risk Factor for In-Hospital Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism After Major Orthopedic Surgery
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, December 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We investigate whether preadmission hyperglycemia is a risk factor for developing in-hospital symptomatic pulmonary embolism after major orthopedic surgery. Medical records of patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty from January 2001 to April 2006 were reviewed. The incidence of PE was 1.47% (107/7282 patients). Multivariate analysis showed that preadmission blood glucose (BG) of at least 200 mg/dL independently increased the risk of pulmonary embolism by 3.19 times (P = .015), when compared with patients with BG of less than 110 mg/dL. Other significant risks factors were age (>or=70 years old), body mass index of more than 30 kg/m(2), and congestive heart failure. Total knee had 2.19 times (P = .002) more risk than total hip arthroplasty and bilateral procedure increased the risk by 2.13 times (P = .015). Sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, duration of surgery, malignancy, pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea, and stroke were not found to be significant risk factors for pulmonary embolism.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 38 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 41 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2026.
All research outputs
#20,080,829
of 31,911,700 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#3,377
of 5,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,741
of 227,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,911,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.