↓ Skip to main content

Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
11 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Implicit race attitudes predict trustworthiness judgments and economic trust decisions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014345108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 428 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 23%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 57 13%
Student > Master 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 79 18%
Unknown 86 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 192 43%
Social Sciences 44 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Neuroscience 21 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 3%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 95 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2026.
All research outputs
#1,469,195
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19,937
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,189
of 161,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#92
of 762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.