Part II. Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, December 2024

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 28 news outlets
blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 89 X users
facebook: 2 Facebook pages
wikipedia: 1 Wikipedia page

reddit: 10 Redditors
video: 8 YouTube creators
bluesky: 2 Bluesky users
podcasts: 5 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley: 219 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 139 X posts from 89 X users, with an upper bound of 329,003 followers.

@lineysk2 Full article: Part II. Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show? https://t.co/stG62TrH7t

@HLPClips This is all a bit in the air. "it is unclear whether the brain requires higher doses of CrM compared to skeletal muscle. (...) a CrM dose and time-response relationship (if any) remains to be determined." https://t.co/z0U6tJPZzx

@MalcolmXodus @Wendi_Irlbeck @espn https://t.co/h88SUil1Z5

📚 Read more: Antonio J. et al. Part II. Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition vol. 22,1 (2025): 2441760. doi: https://t…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 135 additional X posts.