↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Active Labor Market Tools in Conditional Cash Transfers Programs: Evidence for Argentina

Overview of attention for article published in World Development, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of Active Labor Market Tools in Conditional Cash Transfers Programs: Evidence for Argentina
Published in
World Development, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.006
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 39 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 30%
Social Sciences 23 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 40 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2026.
All research outputs
#1,702,727
of 29,283,581 outputs
Outputs from World Development
#789
of 5,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,928
of 341,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Development
#18
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,283,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.