↓ Skip to main content

人工市場を用いた値幅制限・空売り規制・アップティックルールの検証と最適な制度の設計

Overview of attention for article published in IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
人工市場を用いた値幅制限・空売り規制・アップティックルールの検証と最適な制度の設計
Published in
IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems, September 2013
DOI 10.1541/ieejeiss.133.1694
Authors

水田 孝信, 和泉 潔, 八木 勲, 吉村 忍

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 200%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 200%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2013.
All research outputs
#20,331,121
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems
#283
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,214
of 213,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them