↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations of the wwPDB NMR Validation Task Force

Overview of attention for article published in Structure, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recommendations of the wwPDB NMR Validation Task Force
Published in
Structure, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.str.2013.07.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As methods for analysis of biomolecular structure and dynamics using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) continue to advance, the resulting 3D structures, chemical shifts, and other NMR data are broadly impacting biology, chemistry, and medicine. Structure model assessment is a critical area of NMR methods development, and is an essential component of the process of making these structures accessible and useful to the wider scientific community. For these reasons, the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) has convened an NMR Validation Task Force (NMR-VTF) to work with wwPDB partners in developing metrics and policies for biomolecular NMR data harvesting, structure representation, and structure quality assessment. This paper summarizes the recommendations of the NMR-VTF, and lays the groundwork for future work in developing standards and metrics for biomolecular NMR structure quality assessment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
North Macedonia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 19%
Chemistry 21 17%
Computer Science 12 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,036,875
of 27,250,299 outputs
Outputs from Structure
#109
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,475
of 216,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Structure
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,250,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.