↓ Skip to main content

Land Use Change Consistently Reduces α‐ But Not β‐ and γ‐Diversity of Bees

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, January 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
bluesky
47 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Land Use Change Consistently Reduces α‐ But Not β‐ and γ‐Diversity of Bees
Published in
Global Change Biology, January 2025
DOI 10.1111/gcb.70006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby P. N. Tsang, A. A. Amado De Santis, Gabriela Armas‐Quiñonez, John S. Ascher, Eva Samanta Ávila‐Gómez, András Báldi, Kimberly M. Ballare, Mario V. Balzan, Weronika Banaszak‐Cibicka, Svenja Bänsch, Yves Basset, Adam J. Bates, Jessica M. Baumann, Mariana Beal‐Neves, Ashley Bennett, Antonio Diego M. Bezerra, Betina Blochtein, Riccardo Bommarco, Berry Brosi, Laura A. Burkle, Luísa G. Carvalheiro, Ignacio Castellanos, Marcela Cely‐Santos, Hamutahl Cohen, Drissa Coulibaly, Saul A. Cunningham, Sarah Cusser, Isabelle Dajoz, Deborah A. Delaney, Ek Del‐Val, Monika Egerer, Markus P. Eichhorn, Eunice Enríquez, Martin H. Entling, Natalia Escobedo‐Kenefic, Pedro Maria Abreu Ferreira, Gordon Fitch, Jessica R. K. Forrest, Valérie Fournier, Robert Fowler, Breno M. Freitas, Hannah R. Gaines‐Day, Benoît Geslin, Jaboury Ghazoul, Paul Glaum, Jose L. Gonzalez‐Andujar, Adrian González‐Chaves, Heather Grab, Claudio Gratton, Solène Guenat, Catalina Gutiérrez‐Chacón, Mark A. Hall, Mick E. Hanley, Annika Hass, Ernest Ireneusz Hennig, Martin Hermy, Juliana Hipólito, Andrea Holzschuh, Sebastian Hopfenmüller, Keng‐Lou James Hung, Kristoffer Hylander, Jordi Izquierdo, Mary A. Jamieson, Birgit Jauker, Steve Javorek, Shalene Jha, Björn K. Klatt, David Kleijn, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Anikó Kovács‐Hostyánszki, Jochen Krauss, Michael Kuhlmann, Patricia Landaverde‐González, Tanya Latty, Misha Leong, Susannah B. Lerman, Yunhui Liu, Ana Carolina Pereira Machado, Anson Main, Rachel Mallinger, Yael Mandelik, Bruno Ferreira Marques, Kevin Matteson, Frédéric McCune, Ling‐Zeng Meng, Jean Paul Metzger, Paula María Montoya‐Pfeiffer, Carolina Morales, Lora Morandin, Jane Morrison, Sonja Mudri‐Stojnić, Pakorn Nalinrachatakan, Olivia Norfolk, Mark Otieno, Mia G. Park, Stacy M. Philpott, Gideon Pisanty, Montserrat Plascencia, Simon G. Potts, Eileen F. Power, Kit Prendergast, Robyn D. Quistberg, Davi de Lacerda Ramos, André Rodrigo Rech, Victoria Reynolds, Miriam H. Richards, Stuart P. M. Roberts, Malena Sabatino, Ulrika Samnegård, Hillary Sardiñas, Karina Sánchez‐Echeverría, Fernanda Teixeira Saturni, Jeroen Scheper, Amber R. Sciligo, C. Sheena Sidhu, Brian J. Spiesman, Tuanjit Sritongchuay, Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter, Katharina Stein, Alyssa B. Stewart, Jane C. Stout, Hisatomo Taki, Pornpimon Tangtorwongsakul, Caragh G. Threlfall, Carla Faleiro Tinoco, Teja Tscharntke, Katherine J. Turo, Chatura Vaidya, Rémy Vandame, Carlos H. Vergara, Blandina F. Viana, Eric Vides‐Borrell, Natapot Warrit, Elisabeth Webb, Catrin Westphal, Jennifer B. Wickens, Neal M. Williams, Nicholas S. G. Williams, Caleb J. Wilson, Panlong Wu, Elsa Youngsteadt, Yi Zou, Lauren C. Ponisio, Timothy C. Bonebrake

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 32 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 30%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Chemistry 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2025.
All research outputs
#1,118,831
of 34,601,261 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,214
of 7,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,310
of 407,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#13
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.