↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Corrigendum to “Conversion constants for redox potentials measured versus different reference electrodes in acetonitrile solutions at 25 °C” by Vitaly V. Pavlishchuk & Anthony W. Addison, [Inorg. Chim. Acta 298 (2000), 97–102]
Published in
Inorganica Chimica Acta, April 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.ica.2024.122468
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2025.
All research outputs
#19,446,577
of 28,200,174 outputs
Outputs from Inorganica Chimica Acta
#1,936
of 3,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,939
of 255,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganica Chimica Acta
#6
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,200,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.