↓ Skip to main content

Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky
37 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2025
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2023.0209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 36%
Lecturer 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2026.
All research outputs
#1,846,532
of 34,779,718 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,519
of 7,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,880
of 416,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,779,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.