↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Methods in Nutrition Science: The Bone Remodeling Transient: Interpreting Interventions Involving Bone-related Nutrients
Published in
Nutrition Reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06957.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The bone remodeling transient is a temporary alteration in the balance between bone formation and bone resorption, brought about by any agency that affects bone remodeling. Ascertaining the steady state effect of an intervention requires factoring the component of the change due to the transient out of the total bony response. Since parathyroid hormone (PTH) is the principal regulator of the quantity of remodeling activity, and since calcium intake influences PTH secretion, it follows that altering calcium intake will always induce a remodeling transient. Worked examples from three published calcium intervention studies are presented, and the errors that can be made by ignoring the transient and simply measuring change in bone mass across treatment are described.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#5,596,283
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Reviews
#1,098
of 2,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,943
of 139,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Reviews
#142
of 732 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 732 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.