↓ Skip to main content

Different Kenyon Cell Populations Drive Learned Approach and Avoidance in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Different Kenyon Cell Populations Drive Learned Approach and Avoidance in Drosophila
Published in
Neuron, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.045
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In Drosophila, anatomically discrete dopamine neurons that innervate distinct zones of the mushroom body (MB) assign opposing valence to odors during olfactory learning. Subsets of MB neurons have temporally unique roles in memory processing, but valence-related organization has not been demonstrated. We functionally subdivided the αβ neurons, revealing a value-specific role for the ∼160 αβ core (αβc) neurons. Blocking neurotransmission from αβ surface (αβs) neurons revealed a requirement during retrieval of aversive and appetitive memory, whereas blocking αβc only impaired appetitive memory. The αβc were also required to express memory in a differential aversive paradigm demonstrating a role in relative valuation and approach behavior. Strikingly, both reinforcing dopamine neurons and efferent pathways differentially innervate αβc and αβs in the MB lobes. We propose that conditioned approach requires pooling synaptic outputs from across the αβ ensemble but only from the αβs for conditioned aversion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
Germany 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 296 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 26%
Researcher 81 26%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 4%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 35 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 42%
Neuroscience 93 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 6%
Computer Science 10 3%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 36 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,691,126
of 30,023,582 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#6,152
of 10,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,588
of 221,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#86
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,023,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.