↓ Skip to main content

Does artificial light interfere with the activity of nocturnal mammals? An experimental study using road underpasses

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, February 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does artificial light interfere with the activity of nocturnal mammals? An experimental study using road underpasses
Published in
Biological Conservation, February 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110960
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 29 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Environmental Science 7 14%
Unspecified 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 32 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2025.
All research outputs
#3,603,149
of 27,954,878 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,424
of 7,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,828
of 316,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#32
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,954,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.