↓ Skip to main content

Postoperative Radiotherapy ± Cetuximab for Intermediate-Risk Head and Neck Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, January 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Postoperative Radiotherapy ± Cetuximab for Intermediate-Risk Head and Neck Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, January 2025
DOI 10.1200/jco-24-01829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitchell Machtay, Pedro A. Torres-Saavedra, Wade Thorstad, Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân, Lillian L. Siu, F. Christopher Holsinger, Adel El-Naggar, Christine Chung, Anthony Cmelak, Barbara Burtness, Greg Bednarz, Harry Quon, Stephen L. Breen, Clement K. Gwede, Adam P. Dicker, Min Yao, Richard C. Jordan, Jennifer Dorth, Nancy Lee, Jason W. Chan, Neal Dunlap, Voichita Bar-Ad, William A. Stokes, Arnab Chakravarti, David Sher, Shyam Rao, Jonathan Harris, Sue S. Yom, Quynh-Thu Le, Voichita Bar-Ad, Greg Bednarz, Daniel W. Bowles, Stephen Breen, Barbara Burtness, Arnab Chakravarti, Jason Chan, Christine Chung, Anthony Cmelak, Adam P. Dicker, Jennifer Dorth, Neal Dunlap, Adel El-Naggar, Clement K. Gwede, Jonathan Harris, F. Christopher Holsinger, Christopher U. Jones, Richard C. Jordan, Greg A. Krempl, Quynh-Thu Le, Nancy Lee, Christopher Lominska, Daniel J. Ma, Mitchell Machtay, Loren K. Mell, Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan, Harry Quon, Adam Raben, Shyam Rao, Stuart Samuels, David Sher, Lillian L. Siu, Sharon Spencer, William A. Stokes, Vinita Takiar, Wade Thorstad, Pedro Torres-Saavedra, Christopher T. Wilke, Min Yao, Sue S. Yom, Melissa R. Young

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Unknown 11 69%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 11 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2025.
All research outputs
#1,184,607
of 32,549,303 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#3,160
of 30,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,860
of 390,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#45
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,549,303 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.