You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SMALL‐MAMMAL DENSITY ESTIMATION: A FIELD COMPARISON OF GRID‐BASED VS. WEB‐BASED DENSITY ESTIMATORS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Monographs, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073[0001:smdeaf]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Robert R. Parmenter, Terry L. Yates, David R. Anderson, Kenneth P. Burnham, Jonathan L. Dunnum, Alan B. Franklin, Michael T. Friggens, Bruce C. Lubow, Michael Miller, Gail S. Olson, Cheryl A. Parmenter, John Pollard, Eric Rexstad, Tanya M. Shenk, Thomas R. Stanley, Gary C. White |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 4% |
| Brazil | 10 | 2% |
| Argentina | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 379 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 108 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 79 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 17% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Professor | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 82 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 261 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 93 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 54 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,460,512
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#364
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,599
of 141,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.