↓ Skip to main content

Can We “Future-Proof” Consensus Trees?†

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Biology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can We “Future-Proof” Consensus Trees?†
Published in
Systematic Biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syx030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
United Kingdom 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 40%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 45%
Mathematics 3 15%
Computer Science 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2018.
All research outputs
#10,356,747
of 30,071,199 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#1,120
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,840
of 433,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,071,199 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.