↓ Skip to main content

The development and use of vascular targeted therapy in ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologic Oncology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The development and use of vascular targeted therapy in ovarian cancer
Published in
Gynecologic Oncology, February 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.031
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Combination vascular-targeted therapies (VTTs) represent a promising approach for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (OC). VTTs include two mechanistically distinct classes of agents: anti-angiogenic agents (AAs) and vascular-disrupting agents (VDAs). AAs suppress growth of new tumor vasculature through inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and other pro-angiogenic molecules. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to VEGF, has improved progression-free survival (PFS) when given with chemotherapy in patients with advanced OC. VDAs target the established tumor vascular network, inducing vessel occlusion, shutdown of circulation, and widespread necrosis within the tumor interior - a region often resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Tubulin-binding VDAs such as BNC105P, ombrabulin, and combretastatin A4-phosphate (CA4P) have been studied for the treatment of OC. These agents act by binding tubulin in the endothelial cells of tumor vessels, triggering cytoskeletal disruption, altering cellular shape, and destabilizing cell-cell junctions, which lead to increased vascular leakage and, ultimately, to disruption of blood flow. Fundamental differences between the vascular networks of tumors and those of normal tissues allow these agents to selectively reduce tumor circulation while having little effect on non-malignant tissues. Animal studies and clinical trials show enhanced efficacy when VDAs are combined with chemotherapy as well as AAs. The latter combination allows targeting of different aspects of the tumor vasculature, a strong rationale for combining these two drug classes into a single regimen. CA4P is the only VDA in active development for OC. In a phase II trial of patients with recurrent OC, CA4P added to bevacizumab improved PFS compared with bevacizumab alone. The phase II, placebo-controlled PAZOFOS trial (NCT02055690) is evaluating the effects of CA4P plus the anti-angiogenic agent pazopanib in recurrent OC. FOCUS, a phase II/III, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02641639), is currently evaluating CA4P plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in platinum-resistant OC.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Chemistry 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#3,203,432
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology
#506
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,636
of 324,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.