↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
IL-4 mediated by HSV vector suppresses morphine withdrawal response and decreases TNFα, NR2B, and pC/EBPβ in the periaqueductal gray in rats
Published in
Gene Therapy, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/gt.2017.11
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic opiates induce the development of physical dependence. Opioid physical dependence characterized by withdrawal symptoms, may have very long-lasting effects on the motivation for reward, including the incubation of cue-induced drug-seeking behavior. Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in physical dependence is crucial to developing more effective treatment strategies for opioid dependence. Chronic morphine induces production of proinflammatory cytokines in regional-specific sites of the brain. Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is a prototypical anti-inflammatory cytokine that globally suppresses proinflammatory cytokines. Here, we used recombinant herpes simplex virus (HSV) vector S4IL4 that encode mouse il4 gene to evaluate the therapeutic potential of IL-4 in naloxone-precipitation morphine withdrawal (MW). One week after microinjection of the vector S4IL4 into the PAG LacZ or mouse IL-4 immunoreactivity in the vlPAG was visualized. ELISA assay showed that vector S4IL4 into the PAG induced the expression of IL-4. S4IL4 blunted the morphine withdrawal syndrome. S4IL4 suppressed the upregulated TNFα, NR2B, and pC/EBPβ in the PAG induced by MW. These results show that inhibition of proinflammatory factor in the PAG suppressed MW. This study may provide a novel therapeutic approach to morphine physical withdrawal symptoms.Gene Therapy accepted article preview online, 16 February 2017. doi:10.1038/gt.2017.11.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#27,041,432
of 29,905,648 outputs
Outputs from Gene Therapy
#3,210
of 3,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,162
of 329,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene Therapy
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,905,648 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.