↓ Skip to main content

The Nature of Covariation Between Autistic Traits and Clumsiness: A Twin Study in a General Population Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Nature of Covariation Between Autistic Traits and Clumsiness: A Twin Study in a General Population Sample
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1199-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While social impairment, difficulties with communication, and restricted repetitive behaviors are central features of Autism Spectrum Disorders, physical clumsiness is a commonly co-occuring feature. In a sample of 398 twin pairs (aged 8-17 years) from the Italian Twin Registry we investigated the nature of the co-variation between a psychometric index of Clumsiness and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Autistic scale. Bivariate twin analyses showed that a genetic etiological overlap, rather than direct causation, is a plausible explanation for the association between clumsiness and autistic-like traits, as measured by indices derived from the parent-rated CBCL scale. Additive genetic influences that impinge upon clumsiness/motor problem and autistic-like traits coincided remarkably, with a genetic correlation of 0.63.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 33 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#19,303,618
of 29,645,538 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4,183
of 5,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,420
of 134,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,645,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.