↓ Skip to main content

The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
5 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance?
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00602
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool for cognitive enhancement and neurorehabilitation in clinical disorders in both cognitive and clinical domains (e.g., chronic pain, tinnitus). Here we suggest the potential role of tDCS in modulating cortical excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance and thereby inducing improvements. We suggest that part of the mechanism of action of tDCS can be explained by non-invasive modulations of the E/I balance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 426 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 19%
Researcher 70 16%
Student > Master 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 72 16%
Unknown 87 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 98 22%
Neuroscience 89 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 7%
Engineering 21 5%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 116 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,030,973
of 32,883,121 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,058
of 8,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,577
of 336,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#481
of 863 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,883,121 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 863 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.