↓ Skip to main content

Interim Estimates of 2024–2025 COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Adults Aged ≥18 Years — VISION and IVY Networks, September 2024–January 2025

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, February 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interim Estimates of 2024–2025 COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Among Adults Aged ≥18 Years — VISION and IVY Networks, September 2024–January 2025
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, February 2025
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7406a1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Link-Gelles, Sean Chickery, Alexander Webber, Toan C. Ong, Elizabeth A.K. Rowley, Malini B. DeSilva, Kristin Dascomb, Stephanie A. Irving, Nicola P. Klein, Shaun J. Grannis, Michelle A. Barron, Sarah E. Reese, Charlene McEvoy, Tamara Sheffield, Allison L. Naleway, Ousseny Zerbo, Colin Rogerson, Wesley H. Self, Yuwei Zhu, Adam S. Lauring, Emily T. Martin, Ithan D. Peltan, Adit A. Ginde, Nicholas M. Mohr, Kevin W. Gibbs, David N. Hager, Matthew E. Prekker, Amira Mohamed, Nicholas Johnson, Jay S. Steingrub, Akram Khan, Jamie R. Felzer, Abhijit Duggal, Jennifer G. Wilson, Nida Qadir, Christopher Mallow, Jennie H. Kwon, Cristie Columbus, Ivana A. Vaughn, Basmah Safdar, Jarrod M. Mosier, Estelle S. Harris, James D. Chappell, Natasha Halasa, Cassandra Johnson, Karthik Natarajan, Nathaniel M. Lewis, Sascha Ellington, Emily L. Reeves, Jennifer DeCuir, Meredith McMorrow, Clinton R. Paden, Amanda B. Payne, Fatimah S. Dawood, Diya Surie, CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Collaborators, CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Collaborators, Joshua Acidera, Laura Aguilar Marquez, Omobosola Akinsete, Harith Ali, Erika Alor, Ike Appleton, Julie Arndorfer, Olivia Arter, Sarah W. Ball, Jaskiran Bansal, Anna Barrow, Leonard Basobas, Adrienne Baughman, Paul W. Blair, Lawrence Block, Bryce Bosworth, Noah Brazer, Genesis Briceno, Daniel Bride, Samuel M. Brown, Sydney Buehrig, Ashley Bychkowski, Sukantha Chandresakaran, Steven Y. Chang, Catia Chavez, Dylan Clark, Sydney A. Cornelison, Jonathan M. Davis, Brian E. Dixon, Thomas J. Duszynski, Inih Essien, Yvette Evans, William F. Fadel, Cathy Fairfield, Courtney Feitsam, Samantha Ferguson, Tammy Fisher, Omai Garner, Sheila Gasparek, Heath Gibbs, Daniela Gonzalez, Alexandra June Gordon, Anirudh Goyal, Carlos G. Grijalva, Sydney Guthrie-Baker, Jacob Hampton, John Hansen, Ebaad Haq, Adrian Hernandez-Frausto, Kinsley Hubel, Mariana Hurutado-Rodriguez, Cameron Hypes, Karen B. Jacobson, Milad Karami Jouzestani, Sindhuja Koneru, Padma Koppolu, Olivia Krol, Lily Lau, Jenna Lumpkin, Karen Lutrick, Cara T. Lwin, Kevin Ma, Kimberly Manchester, Denisse Mariscal, Amanda Martinez, David Mayer, Rylie McBride, David McDonald, Maile McKeown, Sachina Mensah, Nicholas Mohr, Paul Nassar, Caroline O'Neil, Josh Van Otterloo, Elianora Ovchiyan, Bijal Parikh, Jose Pena, Cynthia Perez, Gabriela Perez, Vanessa Pitre, Edvinas Pocius, Jacob Rademacher, Mayur Ramesh, Caitlin Ray, Carolina Rivas, Safa Saeed, Akshay Saluja, Elizabeth Salvagio Campbell, Carleigh Samuels, Maria Santana-Garces, Tanisha Shack, Samantha Simon, Ine Sohn, Vasisht Srinivasan, Hannah Strait, Amy Sullivan, H. Keipp Talbot, Grace Kyin-ye Tam, Shruti Tirumala, Cody Tran, Emily Tribbett, Alyssa Valencia, Ivan Valesquez, Lucy Vogt, Kim Vu, Francesca Yerbic, Arda Yigitkanli, Anne Zepeski

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 325 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 21 62%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2026.
All research outputs
#13,993
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#329
of 5,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216
of 365,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 276.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.