Comparative efficacy and safety of stent retrievers as a bailout strategy following failed contact aspiration technique in acute stroke thrombectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, January 2025

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 9 news outlets

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Comparative efficacy and safety of stent retrievers as a bailout strategy following failed contact aspiration technique in acute stroke thrombectomy
Published in	Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, January 2025
DOI	10.1136/jnis-2024-022781
Pubmed ID	39884851
Authors	Mohamad Ezzeldin, Mishaal Hukamdad, Rahim Abo Kasem, Rime Ezzeldin, Ilko Maier, Ansaar T, Pascal Jabbour, Joon-Tae Kim, Brian M Howard, Ali Alawieh, Stacey Q Wolfe, Robert M Starke, Marios-Nikos Psychogios, Amir Shaban, Nitin Goyal, Justin Dye, Ali Alaraj, Shinichi Yoshimura, David Fiorella, Omar Tanweer, Daniele G Romano, Pedro Navia, Hugo Cuellar, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Justin R Mascitelli, Joshua W Osbun, Fazeel Siddiqui, Mark Moss, Kaustubh Limaye, Maxim Mokin, Charles Matouk, Min S Park, Waleed Brinjikji, Ergun Daglioglu, Richard Williamson, David J Altschul, Christopher S Ogilvy, Roberto Javier Crosa, Michael R Levitt, Benjamin Gory, Ramesh Grandhi, Alexandra R Paul, Peter Kan, Walter Casagrande, Shakeel A Chowdhry, Michael F Stiefel, Varun Chaubal, Alejandro M Spiotta

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2026.

All research outputs

#871,935

of 34,306,620 outputs

Outputs from Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

#56

of 3,317 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#11,231

of 408,540 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

of 72 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 3,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.