↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of canopy photography for forest ecology and biodiversity studies

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, March 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
4 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reliability of canopy photography for forest ecology and biodiversity studies
Published in
Ecological Indicators, March 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113293
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 19 61%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Environmental Science 4 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 19 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2025.
All research outputs
#9,343,038
of 29,304,381 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#1,544
of 4,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,128
of 338,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#12
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,304,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.