↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Workshop report: One Health challenges and knowledge gaps in the control of intracellular infections with a focus on tuberculosis and leishmaniasis
Published in
Vaccine, March 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Miller, Maria Adelaida Gómez, Rachel Tanner, Samantha Vermaak, Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos, VALIDATE Network One Health Working Group, Salem Almujri, Federico Blanco, Thouraya Boussoffara, Richard Burchmore, Peter Buss, Lin-Mari de Klerk-Lorist, Juan Carlos Dib, Maria Echavarría, Giovanni Ghelmetti, Amanda Gibson, Maria Adelaida Gomez, Wynand Goosen, Eamonn Gormley, Christian Gortazar, Ana Marcia Guimarães, Rogelio Hernandez Pando, Nastassja Kriel, Rajiv Kumar, Michele Miller, Munyaradzi Musvosvi, Jairo Enrique Palomares Velosa, Christine Petersen, Fred Quinn, Niaina Rakotosamimanana, Samantha Sampson, Sara Savic, Cristian Alfredo Segura-Cerda, Rachel Tanner, Begna Tulu, Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos, Robert John Wilkinson, Cate Williams, Samantha Vermaak, Blakeley Nixon

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Unknown 20 65%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 21 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2025.
All research outputs
#21,302,714
of 31,739,297 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#15,897
of 19,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,665
of 345,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#70
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,739,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.