↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tai Chi for Tension Headaches

Overview of attention for article published in Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), June 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tai Chi for Tension Headaches
Published in
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), June 2006
DOI 10.1093/ecam/nel050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan B. Abbott, Ka-Kit Hui, Ron D. Hays, Ming-Dong Li, Timothy Pan

Abstract

This study examined whether a traditional low-impact mind-body exercise, Tai Chi, affects health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and headache impact in an adult population suffering from tension-type headaches. Forty-seven participants were randomly assigned to either a 15 week intervention program of Tai Chi instruction or a wait-list control group. HRQOL (SF-36v2) and headache status (HIT-6trade mark) were obtained at baseline and at 5, 10 and 15 weeks post-baseline during the intervention period. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements in favor of the intervention were present for the HIT score and the SF-36 pain, energy/fatigue, social functioning, emotional well-being and mental health summary scores. A 15 week intervention of Tai Chi practice was effective in reducing headache impact and also effective in improving perceptions of some aspects of physical and mental health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 121 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Other 36 29%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 33%
Psychology 12 10%
Sports and Recreations 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,206,097
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#644
of 9,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,664
of 126,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.