↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing Robustness and Charge Transfer Kinetics of Sodium-Ion Batteries through Introduction of Anionic Anchoring Separators

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, March 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Enhancing Robustness and Charge Transfer Kinetics of Sodium-Ion Batteries through Introduction of Anionic Anchoring Separators
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, March 2025
DOI 10.1021/jacs.4c16227
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Ionic transport critically dictates the performance of the batteries. Here, we proposed an anion anchoring strategy for enhancing Na+ transport kinetics that was based on introducing a separator with a positive surface potential. Besides, we developed a nuclear magnetic resonance-assisted Hittorf approach to address the limitation of the traditional Bruce-Vincent approach itself in order to accurately quantify the migration dynamics of anions on the time scale. Results indicate that this strategy effectively anchors free anions and increases the proportion of solvent-separated ion pairs in the bulk, reduces the cation transfer energy barrier at the anode, and mitigates parasitic reactions at the cathode. The symmetric Na||Na cells efficiently operate over 1600 h, and the Na||Na3V2(PO4)3 cells show stable cycling performance under limited Na excess and lean electrolyte conditions. The assembled HC||Na3V2(PO4)3 pouch cells achieve an energy density of up to 225.7 W h kg-1. Our strategy offers a new option for high-energy and long-cycle sodium-ion batteries.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Energy 1 8%
Materials Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2025.
All research outputs
#18,483,969
of 27,876,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#63,442
of 71,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,694
of 161,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#363
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,876,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.