↓ Skip to main content

Low-Dose Valacyclovir for Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Zoster Eye Disease Study

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Low-Dose Valacyclovir for Postherpetic Neuralgia in the Zoster Eye Disease Study
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, April 2025
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6113
Pubmed ID
Authors

David B. Warner, Bennie H. Jeng, Jiyu Kim, Mengling Liu, Andrea B. Troxel, Judith S. Hochman, Keith H. Baratz, Shahzad I. Mian, Mazen Y. Choulakian, Jay J. Meyer, Ying Lu, Alberta Twi-Yeboah, Ting-Fang Lee, Carlos Lopez-Jimenez, Sarah C. Laury, Elisabeth J. Cohen, Sarah B Weissbart, Azin Abazari, Timothy Y Chou, Eileen Chang, Guillermo Amescua, Rahul Tonk, Elaine Koo, Jaime D Martinez, Anat Galor, Sanjay V Patel, John S Berestka, Afshan A Nanji, Winston Chamberlain, Richard Stutzman, John Clements, James Chodosh, Emma C Davies, Hajirah Saeed, Jessica B Ciralsky, Ana G Alzaga Fernandez, Kimberly C Sippel, Victor L Perez-Quinones, Melissa Daluvoy, Katy Liu, Mark D Ewald, Erich B Groos, Bernard Chang, Ira A Shivitz, Jordan Hill, Priscilla G Fowler, Russell W Read, Harry S Geggel, Ahmed Omar, Sayegh Rony, Christopher J Rapuano, Beeran Meghpara, Zeba Syed, Gary N Holland, Olivia Lee, John Irvine, Sophie X Deng, Anthony Aldave, Tsui Edmund, Judy Chen, Marc A Honig, Lee A Snyder, Andrew JW Huang, Todd P Margolis, Anthony Lubniewski, Douglas G Katz, Seema Capoor, John Gonzales, Gerami Seitzman, Jeremy Keenan, Melina Morkin, Kenneth R Kenyon, Pedram Hamrah, William B Lee, Joseph G Christenbury, Kara C LaMattina, Hyunjoo Lee, Kambiz Negahban, Ronihi Rao, Christine S Ament, Marta O Lopatynsky, John D Barbato, Jayati S Sarkar, Marian Macsai, Joshua B Herz, Mitchell P Weikert, Zaina Al-Mohtaseb, Alice Y Matoba, Theresa Cooney, Christopher Hood, Maria Woodward, Alan Sugar, Roni M Shtein, Sarah M Nehls, Evan J Warner, Greg Nettune, Brad Bowman, Henry Gelender, Jamie K Alexander, Tyrone McCall, Joshua Zaffos, Walter Beebe, Luke B Potts, Jay Lustbader, Aruoriwo M Oboh-Weilke, Kristin M Hammersmith, Stephen E Orlin, Parveen Nagra, Michael Sulewski, Vatinee Bunya, Brian Shafer, Christina R Prescott, Ilyse Haberman, Elizabeth Viriya, Anam Qureshi, Douglas Lazzaro, Laura Palazzolo, Himani Goyal, Katie E Schrack, Irving M Raber, Brandon Ayres, Brenton Finklea, Sherman Reeves, Omar E Awad, David R Hardten, Charles D Reilly, William J Flynn, Edward D Rashid, Angie E Wen, David C Ritterband, David J Harris, Sumayya Ahmad, Neha Shaik, John A Seedor, Steven I Rosenfeld, Marc Winnick, Ahmad Amir, Mark D Sherman, Divya Srikumaran, Esen Akpek, Benjamin Chaon, Sarkis H Soukiasian, Naveen K Rao, Anne S Steiner, Jules Winokur, Ira Udell, Carolyn Shih, Matthew Gorski, Amilia Schrier, Ann Marie Lobo-Chan, Joel Sugar, Elmer Tu, Wuqaas W Munir, Sarah Sunshine, Donald M Miller, William G Gensheimer, Michael E Zegans, Jayne S Weiss, Maria Bernal, Bruce Barron, Holly B Hindman, Ronald Wise, Christopher Gelston, Michael J Taravella, Richard S Davidson, Uyen L Tran, Christine Shieh, Jeremy Bartley, James McCulley, Steven Verity, Wayne Bowman, Preston Blomquist, Venkateswara V Mootha, George Thorne, Ann M Renucci, David Verdier, Kavitha Sivaraman, Michael Nordlund, Frank S Hwang, John Affeldt, Herbert Ingraham, Nathalie M Guibord, Kendall R B Dobbins, Tarika Thareja, Amy Lin, Brian Zaugg, Mark Mifflin, Stephan Lance Forstot, Robert A Fish, Karen Repine, Michael Wildes, Christopher B Estopinal, Donna Brown, Aaleya Koreishi, Patricia Ple-Plakon, Carol S Clemons, Ravi Patel, Penny A Asbell, Stephen Aaron Ashe, Sarah Bonaffini, Kourtney Houser, Michael Wallace, Jesse M Wesberry, Alfonso Iovieno, Sonia Yeung, Joshua C Teichman, Nima Noordeh, Anne Faucher, Marie-Claude Robert, Mona Harissi-Dagher, Jacob Rullo, Stephanie Baxter, Davin Johnson, Dean Mah, Matthew Benson, Stephan Ong Tone, Hall Chew, Mojgan Hassonlou, Shaohui Liu, Jennifer L Eikenberry, Chi-Wah Yung, Joanne F Shen, Charles Lin, Charles Yu, Christopher Ta, Kenneth R Goins, John Sutphin, Kerri Svanda, Stacy Keppol, Audrey Rostov, Neil M Vyas, Kimberly Hsu, Gerri Goodman, Lisa McHam, Dale Oates, Ramy Rizkalla, Anita Shukla, Mathew Veena, Craig See, Jeffrey Goshe, Robert S Feder, Jeanine Baqai, Surendra Basti, Ramez Haddadin, Jae Young You, Lena A Dixit, Ravi H Patel, Kimberly T Golde, Gerald W Zaidman, Sankara Mahesh, Vikas Sharma, Jason Wesolosky, Darby D Miller, Jeffrey H Ma, Mark Mannis, Rachael Niederer

Abstract

Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (<60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [<6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, -20.8% to 25.8%]; P>.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months (P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, -3.39 months [95% CI, -6.73 to -0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 14 74%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Unknown 13 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2025.
All research outputs
#5,881,578
of 31,739,297 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#1,850
of 4,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,353
of 343,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#35
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,739,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.