↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of a Diagnostic Reminder System on Student Clinical Reasoning During Simulated Case Studies

Overview of attention for article published in Simulation in Healthcare, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of a Diagnostic Reminder System on Student Clinical Reasoning During Simulated Case Studies
Published in
Simulation in Healthcare, February 2011
DOI 10.1097/sih.0b013e3181f24acd
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diagnostic reminder systems (DRS) may help students improve their clinical reasoning skill and gain competency in using informatics tools. This study explored the influence of Isabel PRO, a web-based DRS, on student diagnostic reasoning during simulated encounters.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 16 29%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Computer Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#22,212,435
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#568
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,330
of 256,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.