The impact of COVID-19 on physical function (PF) outcomes among older adults remains unclear. We examined the long-term association between COVID, PF, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) among women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).
Participants from the WHI who completed the COVID-19 survey (2021-2022) and annual survey (2022) were included. Self-reported data on COVID-19 testing and symptoms (2021-2022) were used. PF score and ADLs were evaluated pre- and post-COVID-19 survey by the 36-Item Short Form Survey PF subscale, the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, and the Katz Index of Independence in ADL. Multivariable linear regression and logistic regression were used and adjusted for pre-COVID functioning to examine the association between COVID status, PF, and ADLs. The interaction between pre-COVID functioning and COVID status was tested.
Among the 13,933 WHI participants, 71.4% were aged ≥ 80 years, and 88.6% were Non-Hispanic White. Only 8.7% tested positive for COVID-19 (n = 1210), with 35.1% having long COVID (n = 425). The most common long COVID symptoms were fatigue (18.2%), malaise (12.2%), memory problems (12.1%), and brain fog (11.2%). Women who tested COVID+ had lower PF scores (60 vs. 65, p = 0.045) and were less likely to be able to do all ADLs without help (74% vs. 79.2%, p = 0.015) compared to those who never tested COVID+. After controlling for covariates, post-COVID PF scores did not differ by COVID status (p = 0.30), although pre-COVID PF scores were significantly linked to post-COVID scores (p < 0.001). Similarly, the odds of being able to do all ADLs without any help did not differ by COVID status (p = 0.31), with pre-COVID ADLs significantly associated with post-COVID ADLs (p < 0.001).
In older women, after accounting for pre-COVID functional status, the association between long COVID and lower functioning became nonsignificant. Our findings highlight the importance of preserving physical functioning among older women.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2025.
All research outputs
#2,463,362
of 28,583,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#2,285
of 9,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,220
of 332,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#28
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,583,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
