You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Temperature-Dependent Growth of Geomyces destructans, the Fungus That Causes Bat White-Nose Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0046280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle L. Verant, Justin G. Boyles, William Waldrep, Gudrun Wibbelt, David S. Blehert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 21% |
| Researcher | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 129 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,297,713
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,668
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,345
of 195,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#657
of 4,449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.