You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance of Quantitative Vegetation Sampling Methods Across Gradients of Cover in Great Basin Plant Communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rangeland Ecology & Management, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2111/rem-d-13-00063.1 |
| Authors |
David S. Pilliod, Robert S. Arkle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 22% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Rangeland Ecology & Management
#187
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,846
of 226,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rangeland Ecology & Management
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.