You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1890/11-0599.1 |
| Authors |
Angela L. Strecker, Julian D. Olden, Joanna B. Whittier, Craig P. Paukert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 12 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 337 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 21% |
| Researcher | 73 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 183 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 112 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#3,241
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,531
of 251,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.