↓ Skip to main content

Stabilization mechanism accommodating genome length variation in evolutionarily related viral capsids

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stabilization mechanism accommodating genome length variation in evolutionarily related viral capsids
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2025
DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-58298-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tailed bacteriophages are one of the most numerous and diverse group of viruses. They store their genome at quasi-crystalline densities in capsids built from multiple copies of proteins adopting the HK97-fold. The high density of the genome exerts an internal pressure, requiring a maturation process that reinforces their capsids. However, it is unclear how capsid stabilization strategies have adapted to accommodate the evolution of larger genomes in this virus group. Here we characterize a capsid reinforcement mechanism in two evolutionary-related actinobacteriophages that modifies the length of a stabilization protein to accommodate a larger genome while maintaining the same capsid size. We use cryo-EM to reveal that capsids contain split hexamers of HK97-fold proteins with a stabilization protein in the chasm. The observation of split hexamers in mature capsids is unprecedented, so we rationalize this result mathematically, discovering that icosahedral capsids can be formed by all split or skewed hexamers as long as their T-number is not a multiple of three. Our results suggest that analogous stabilization mechanisms can be present in other icosahedral capsids, and they provide a strategy for engineering capsids accommodating larger DNA cargoes as gene delivery systems.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2025.
All research outputs
#23,376,494
of 28,589,707 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#64,930
of 70,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,978
of 328,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#2,321
of 2,607 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,589,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,607 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.