↓ Skip to main content

The RAD52 double-ring remodels replication forks restricting fork reversal

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
bluesky
14 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The RAD52 double-ring remodels replication forks restricting fork reversal
Published in
Nature, April 2025
DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-08753-1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human RAD52 is a multifunctional DNA repair protein involved in several cellular events that support genome stability, including protection of stalled DNA replication forks from excessive degradation1-4. In its gatekeeper role, RAD52 binds to and stabilizes stalled replication forks during replication stress, protecting them from reversal by SMARCAL1 motor3. The structural and molecular mechanism of the RAD52-mediated fork protection remains elusive. Here, using P1 nuclease sensitivity, biochemical and single-molecule analyses, we show that RAD52 dynamically remodels replication forks through its strand exchange activity. The presence of the single-stranded DNA binding protein RPA at the fork modulates the kinetics of the strand exchange without impeding the reaction outcome. Mass photometry and single-particle cryo-electron microscopy show that the replication fork promotes a unique nucleoprotein structure containing head-to-head arrangement of two undecameric RAD52 rings with an extended positively charged surface that accommodates all three arms of the replication fork. We propose that the formation and continuity of this surface is important for the strand exchange reaction and for competition with SMARCAL1.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2025.
All research outputs
#683,290
of 32,892,220 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#27,502
of 115,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,512
of 351,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#612
of 1,199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,892,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.