↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review and consensus conceptual model of meaningful symptoms and functional impacts in early Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in npj Parkinson's Disease, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic review and consensus conceptual model of meaningful symptoms and functional impacts in early Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
npj Parkinson's Disease, April 2025
DOI 10.1038/s41531-025-00907-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer R. Mammen, Jamie L. Adams, Rikki Mangrum, Yuge Xiao, William Barbosa, Mirinda Tyo, Christopher Redmond, Cheryl Carter, Kelly Cifelli, Robert Cifelli, Hope Maruzo, Jim Meeker, Gerry Shultz, Colbren Thomas, Claire Bale, Evan Davies, Catherine M. Kopil, Connie Marras, Tiago Mestre, Thomas Morel, Tanya Simuni, Glenn T. Stebbins, Daniel Weintraub, Diane Stephenson

Abstract

A comprehensive, patient-centered conceptual model of early Parkinson's is lacking and is greatly needed. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research was conducted by a multi-stakeholder taskforce using JBI Mixed Methods Review criteria and GRADE-CERQual standards for assessment of evidence. Over 340 symptoms and impacts were identified across ten symptom domains (Movement, Cognitive, Psychiatric, Sleep, Sensory, Speech, Digestive, Urinary, Sexual, Autonomic) and two impact domains (Physical and Psychosocial functioning). A wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms were present in early disease, with strongest support for tremor, dexterity, gait, stiffness, slow movements, cognitive, mood, and sleep alterations, urinary dysfunction, constipation, pain, and fatigue. These affected mobility, self-concept, coping, effort of living, interactions and important activities, with evidence of many understudied concepts. This model offers the most comprehensive catalogue of symptoms and impacts in Parkinson's to date and will support clinical practice and endpoint selection for therapeutic trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 31 70%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 29 66%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2025.
All research outputs
#25,225,376
of 28,033,187 outputs
Outputs from npj Parkinson's Disease
#878
of 890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,407
of 155,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Parkinson's Disease
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,033,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.