↓ Skip to main content

Notes from the Field: Response to a Case of Travel-Associated Lassa Fever — Iowa, October–November 2024

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
12 Bluesky users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Notes from the Field: Response to a Case of Travel-Associated Lassa Fever — Iowa, October–November 2024
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, April 2025
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7411a3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana L. Von Stein, Alexandra Barger, Andrew Hennenfent, Robert Ramaekers, Amanda Mandi, Kenzie Teno, Karen Brust, Jonathan Simmons, Nicholas Mohr, Lisa Veach, Sudhir Kumar, Aneesa Afroze, Emily McCutchen, Amanda Bartling, Michael Pentella, Megan Nelson, Jennifer Craft, Rikki Hetzler, Amy Thoreson, Alicia Coppedge, Sam Jarvis, Jennifer Miller, Alison M. Todres, Jessica L. Wickline, Sheena Tarrant, Leanna Sayyad, Inna Krapiunaya, Amy Schuh, Amy Whitesell, Gerard C. Kuotu, Kiara McNamara, Nancy Cornish, Shelly Schwedhelm, Angela Vasa, Angela Hewlett, Shantyl Galloway, Aaron D. Kofman, Katrin S. Sadigh, Robert Kruse, Barbara Knust, Matthew Donahue

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,197,300
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#2,065
of 5,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,967
of 361,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#27
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 275.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.