↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of different surgeries for correction of fixed flatfoot deformity studied through a dynamic model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, March 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of different surgeries for correction of fixed flatfoot deformity studied through a dynamic model
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, March 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112650
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luigi Piarulli, Caludio Belvedere, Sorin Siegler

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2025.
All research outputs
#23,075,715
of 28,241,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomechanics
#5,079
of 5,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,548
of 290,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomechanics
#33
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,241,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.