↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Plant functional types and traits as biodiversity indicators for tropical forests: two biogeographically separated case studies including birds, mammals and termites
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10531-013-0517-1
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 6 2%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 245 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Student > Master 42 16%
Researcher 38 15%
Professor 19 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 43%
Environmental Science 71 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,482,669
of 26,756,610 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,208
of 2,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,771
of 209,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,756,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.