AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Evidence Based Decision Making - A Review of Cutting Edge Recent Literature Related to Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
Study DesignLiterature review of key topics related to degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) with critical appraisal and clinical recommendations.ObjectiveThis article summarizes several key current topics related to the management of DCM.MethodsRecent literature related to the management of DCM was reviewed. Four articles were selected and critically appraised. Recommendations were graded as Strong or Conditional.ResultsArticle 1: The Relationship Between pre-operative MRI Signal Intensity and outcomes. Conditional recommendation to use diffusion-weighted imaging MR signal changes in the cervical cord to evaluate prognosis following surgical intervention for DCM. Article 2: Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild DCM. Conditional recommendation that surgery is a valid option for mild DCM with favourable clinical outcomes. Article 3: Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Strong recommendation that there is equipoise in the outcomes of anterior vs posterior surgical approaches in cases where either technique could be used. Article 4: Machine learning-based cluster analysis of DCM phenotypes. Conditional recommendation that clinicians consider pain, medical frailty, and the impact on health-related quality of life when counselling patients.ConclusionsDCM requires a multidimensional assessment including neurological dysfunction, pain, impact on health-related quality of life, medical frailty and MR imaging changes in the cord. Surgical treatment is effective and is a valid option for mild DCM. In patients where either anterior or posterior surgical approaches can be used, both techniques afford similar clinical benefit albeit with different complication profiles.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2025.
All research outputs
#17,566,316
of 28,192,702 outputs
Outputs from Global Spine Journal
#479
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,101
of 177,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Spine Journal
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,192,702 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.
