↓ Skip to main content

ΛCDM is still not broken: empirical constraints on the star formation efficiency at z ∼12–30

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, October 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
bluesky
3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ΛCDM is still not broken: empirical constraints on the star formation efficiency at z ∼12–30
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, October 2025
DOI 10.1093/mnras/staf1699
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 63%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2025.
All research outputs
#8,942,909
of 29,690,614 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#22,239
of 42,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,307
of 264,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#36
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,690,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.