↓ Skip to main content

Are Washington Circle performance measures associated with decreased criminal activity following treatment?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Are Washington Circle performance measures associated with decreased criminal activity following treatment?
Published in
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, May 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examines the association between adherence to during-treatment process measures of quality (defined as initiation and engagement in treatment as developed by the Washington Circle) and outcome measures (defined as arrests and incarcerations) in the following year. The data come from the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services administrative data system linked to data from state criminal justice agencies. Clients who initiated a new episode of outpatient treatment and who engaged in treatment were significantly less likely to be arrested or incarcerated in the following year. Initiation of substance abuse treatment alone, without engagement in treatment, was not significantly associated with arrests or incarcerations. These findings validate the clinical importance of the Washington Circle performance measures of initiation and engagement. Applying the "process-of-care" measures can make a difference when they are used as a target for quality improvement in treatment facilities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Psychology 6 15%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,943,176
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#461
of 2,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,775
of 114,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.