| Title |
Supervised injection sites: Prejudice should not trump evidence of benefit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.130927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Zlotorzynska, Evan Wood, Julio S. Montaner, Thomas Kerr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 32% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 30% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#430,009
of 25,241,031 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#758
of 9,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,017
of 186,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#13
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,241,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.