You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research: the GAMER Statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, May 2025
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjebm-2025-113825 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xufei Luo, Yih Chung Tham, Mauro Giuffrè, Robert Ranisch, Mohammad Daher, Kyle Lam, Alexander Viktor Eriksen, Che-Wei Hsu, Akihiko Ozaki, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Sahil Khanna, Kuan-Pin Su, Emir Begagić, Zhaoxiang Bian, Yaolong Chen, Janne Estill, Susan L Norris, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Qingyu Chen, Brian D Earp, Lorenzo Righetto, Renne Rodrigues, Yousif Subhi, Egor Chumakov, Sophie Curbo, Aybars Kivrak, Ery Ayelen Ko, Myeong Soo Lee, Dengxiong Li, Andrey Litvin, Peng Liu, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, José Darío Martínez-Ezquerro, Surapaneni Krishna Mohan, Philip Moons, Alejandro Quiroga-Garza, Riaz Qureshi, Ximing Xu, Stephen R Ali, Nash Anderson, Hiroj Bagde, Charlotte Blease, Randy D'Amico, Hannah Decker, Adrian Egli, Shijian Feng, Sheng Li, Nav Persaud, Murali Ramanathan, Gemma Sharp, Ye Wang, Wah Yang, Qing-xin Yu |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| China | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 68% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,006,721
of 34,296,127 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#207
of 1,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,336
of 354,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,296,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.